Talk:Max Kelly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What connection?[edit]

Max Kelly died in 2007. So what is the problematic "personal or professional connection" that, in a banner, a senior editor asserts I may have with Kelly? In this case, I think clarity on what is rather officially considered problematic would be of value. Thank you. KHarbaugh (talk) 11:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@KHarbaugh: The message on your talk page is a request for you to review WP:COI if you have a conflict of interest with Max Kelly or Ross Street in any way. I am not asserting that you have a conflict of interest, but it appears very plausible from an external perspective given your editing behavior in focusing largely on those two biographies for 6 years and adding an extraordinary level of detail (more than even a typical mathematical collaborator would have) on their work.
A conflict of interest is not problematic, but there are strong guidelines on how to deal with a conflict of interest on Wikipedia. If you can disclose your relationship with either person (see WP:DISCLOSE for how), that would make handling the potential conflicts of interest easier. — MarkH21talk 13:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also worth noting: it is extraordinarily rare for an academic biography on Wikipedia to list more than a handful of papers, carefully chosen to be the most significant of the subject's career. Wikipedia is not a platform for hosting CVs. XOR'easter (talk) 20:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]