Talk:Matisyahu Salomon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article only 1 ref, has no 3rd party references, please add some. I have tagged this page as needing immediate attention. The Terminator p t c 23:23, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many references supplied. As Dean of one of the largest yeshivas is the world, he is eminently notable. I am removing the tag. --Redaktor (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Matisyahu Salomon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Matisyahu Salomon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birth town?[edit]

MJF613 has stated that the sentence in the article declaring that Gateshead is the birth town is incorrect. They have stated at User talk:86.22.54.151 that they are in possession of a copy of the birth certificate which lists Highgate, Islington, London as the place of birth (the IP stated here that the birth certificate has it as Highbury, Islington, London; I'm not very familiar with London—are these two "Highs" the same place?) The problem I see with this is that the WP:NOR policy does not allow for unsubstantiated claims such as these (the purported birth certificate might be admissible as a primary source if it can be uploaded, but I would not be able to offer advice about this). What we are left with is multiple sources which name Gateshead as the place, such as Hamodia, Yated, YWN, VIN and Patch (quoting VIN, ironically). However, these sources all seem to be quoting this article, which has been saying it is Gateshead since it was first inserted by FrummerThanThou on November 30, 2006. FTT, who has since only made 1 edit here in 13 years, did not provide a source for Gateshead. Furthermore, they are the primary author of History of the Jews in North East England, a badly sourced article which includes the Gateshead area. I'm not sure what to make of all this, but I doubt we can leave the birthplace as London without a reliable source backing it up. Another option is to list England as the birthplace temporarily (until this matter can be clarified) since that is not controversial. What do others think? StonyBrook babble 07:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Certificate states "1937 birth in the Sub-district of Highbury in the Metroplitan Borough of Islington"
Born 28th November 1937 to Jacob Salomon and Adelheid Salomon nee Ucko 86.22.54.151 (talk) 01:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. For what it's worth, I would take what you are saying here at face value and leave the birthplace as London, for now. However, be aware that relying on birth certificates can be fraught with danger because it is a primary source. One of the main problems is that connecting a paper record to a real person may constitute original research. I am only suggesting leaving it as London because I'm suspicious that the above sources simply copied the information from WP (to get a feel for the problems using birth certificates—and why they nevertheless may have some merit—see for example Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 142 § Birth certificates in public records, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21 § Dido's Birth Certificate, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120 § Jessica Chastain's date of birth and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 66 § DSRCT.com). I suggest you ask at the help desk, the Teahouse, or the Commons help desk about how to upload a copy of the birth certificate. Once that step is done, the editors here will evaluate the evidence, and hopefully enable them to come to a consensus. Otherwise, there is a real potential for this matter to turn into an edit war, which we should try to avoid at all costs. Hope this helps. StonyBrook babble 07:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]