Talk:Martha McClintock

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

I intend to add significantly to this page. It should not be deleted. It is referenced in other entries. Prof. McClintock is an important researcher and director of a major research department at the University of Chicago. Frederde 01:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please add information to this page, but cf the page on the "McClintock effect" and look at the "criticism" section before you do.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replication of results[edit]

Was her her study ever replicated? Did anyone else get the same results?

Has anyone besides McClintock found that pheromones cause menstrual synchrony? What cycle lengths does it synchronize? How much synchronization occurs?

Does she (or her supporters) believe in it even in the face of no other supporting studies? If so, can we categorize her work as pseudoscience? --Uncle Ed (talk) 04:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proven and reproduced countless times testing (e.g.) Hamsters which have a menstrual cycle every 4 days. I think the real dispute is based in the fact that some people like to see the human race in distinction from the other animals or even primates. These people may find pride in our unparalleled ability for empathy and leave menstruation alone.

If science is working well, then some theories will be falsified and some phenomena will be found not to exist. So, it is not pseudoscience. In the 1980s and 1990s, roughly half of the studies reported synchrony and the other half did not. In the early 2000s, it was shown that there were methodological and statistical flaws in the methods used that reported synchrony. After these errors were correct, no one could find synchrony in humans or other mammals. Thus, as of now, there is no empirical evidence that women or other female mammals synchronize their menstrual or estrous cycles. I am One of Many (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]