Talk:María Cristina Orive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 27 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Prissy114. Peer reviewers: Mirandalillian.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review for María Cristina Orive[edit]

I am going to use the peer review rubric shown in the training.


Lead Section:

The lead is good because it introduces what the other sections below it will expand on. I don't think there needs to be much added to this section. 

Clear Structure:

 I think you need to add more sections in general. Instead of just writing one big "biography" section, I would create a lot of more specific ones about different topics in her life and professional work. Maybe add a section that includes her own artwork, and another more detailed one on the photographers she represented as a photojournalist, or one section dedicated to her publishing house since that seems to be her most famous accomplishment. And from what you have so far, I don't really get the sense that she was an artist herself, so maybe talk more about her personal life and work. 

Balancing Act:

I think you did a good job in presenting general highlights of her life and work. I think you should add more sections using what you already have from the biography section, that way it will be a more balanced article and not all focused in one section. And instead of adding a new section for her date of death, you should either add to that, or take it out, since you already said that info in the lead. 

Neutral Content:

I think you did a great job with this section. I don't see any point of view or opinion regarding the artist in your article. 

Reliable Sources:

The first two source links lead to inactive websites, so maybe try to update that. And the last source has some information, but I'm sure there are other sources you can search for online that you can find additional information to help improve your article as a whole. 

Mirandalillian (talk) 01:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Miranda C.[reply]