Talk:Manon Batiste

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture[edit]

Can someone upload a picture of the famous fictious French heroine? ESommers 17:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manon's pic[edit]

I will as soon as I figure out how to make a profile box. Can someone possibly do that for me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bwing55543 (talkcontribs) 20:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Pic con't[edit]

I found one, I hope this one will do.

Merge suggestion[edit]

This article is essentially a fairly decent level-by-level decription of Medal of Honor: Underground - an article which could sorely do with just such a description. I think this page should be deleted and its contents merged into the other one. 82.30.240.26 (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note Wikipedia:Merge and delete. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 20:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The single line of real-world treatment about this character has already been integrated into the game article. I've restored the redirect. --EEMIV (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Nobody or whomever, please offer a substantial rationale on this talk page for retaining this page -- the real-world treatment of which is fleeting and negligible. I made a bold edit with a note on this talk page, you reverted it -- but where's your response to the discussion? --EEMIV (talk) 16:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
She is one out of millions of game characters based on an actual historical figure worthy of an article as well and is a playable character in a major game series covered by multiple reliable sources. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I support these redirects (Jimmy Patterson, too). We don't need millions of game characters here; take it to Wikia, please. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 16:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes in references[edit]

Please don't remove the quotes from reference, they are part of the citation system. We don't have a crystal ball to see what the future holds and what website will be around next year, let alone in 50 years. A person shou;dnt have to read an entire article just to see if the fact is really justified by the text, this is one more step in ensuring it does. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't see you there. I was going through template-ing and thought I'd errantly left a quote in. I removed it because the quote refers to one snippet of detail, but it stands there to substantiate two claims; one claim was "out in the cold." In general, I tend not to see the quote= field used much (and it wasn't elsewhere in the article), so I went through and axed it. If you feel like quote=ing all the sources, go for it. --EEMIV (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]