Talk:Malcolm Tucker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protagonist? antihero?[edit]

Starting a discussion here on the IP's removal - and now mine - of "and antihero" from the first sentence of the lede, which formerly read "is the protagonist and antihero". I agree with the IP that the two terms appear to contradict each other; based on the article I'm not sure "is the protagonist" is the best wording, however. Antihero on the face of it designates a foil to the protagonist, or "hero". If he is the sole main character and is a character "we love to hate", it might be better to qualify "protagonist" with an adjective such as "unlikeable"; this would fit with the use of the POV "notorious" later in the article, but reliable sources would be required. "Morally complex" might be better based on the entire discussion later in the article, and would be safely neutral. On the other hand, I do not see the article stating that he is the single main character, and if the series in fact does not have one main character, so "one of the main characters" would be better and would avoid the whole issue, although something like "morally complex" or "unlikeable" - depending on sources - would still be desirable in the lede to match the content of the article. Are tehre sources that refer to him as an "antihero" or by some equivalent term such as "foil to" one or more main characters? If so, "antihero" would be apposite in the lede but "the protagonist" would be contradictory - and "a main character" redundant. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Antihero" does not "designate a foil to the protagonist". Since you kindly linked to the word, perhaps you could follow the link and find out it means precisely an unlikeable main character. "Protagonist or antihero" is a a very good description: he is a main character that people can choose to love or hate. Mezigue (talk) 20:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But is he the protagonist? Also, while the lede of our article doesn't cover it, the body quite clearly depicts the antihero as usually a foil to the major protagonist - starting with this sentence: "The antihero emerged as a foil to the traditional hero archetype". As I outline above, calling him both the protagonist and an "antihero" does set up a contradiction. And the article does not seem to actually say he is the single main character, or have a referenced statement calling him "antihero". If tehre are several main characters in this series, is he one of them? And does he stand out by being "morally complex" or whatever the sources say? Finally, are there sources calling him an "antihero"? From what I see in the article, I suggest something like: "a main character who is morally complex, in many ways unlikeable". What do the sources say? Yngvadottir (talk) 22:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Malcolm Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recovering alcoholic?[edit]

Is he a recovering alcoholic? He noticeably squirms when Nicola asks what his favourite drink is, Ollie's whiskey question in the last episode sounds rather barbed, I'm pretty sure he's never seen drinking alcohol, and the real-life political figure he's based on (Alastair Campbell) is. Have any fo the writers commented on this?--MartinUK (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malcolm Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]