Talk:M. N. Dastur

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Same information avaliable in news papers and other media.Lakshmikanta Manna (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Lakshmikanta Manna (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

M N Dastur[edit]

Further news papers are also taken the information from the company's site. Biography of a person written should have identical statements.Lakshmikanta Manna (talk) 12:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Lakshmikanta Manna (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC) The article is a biography of a person. Information for him are available in newspaper after his death. The news papers have also published information relating to Dr.Dastur taking from the from the Company's website and it is made public. Further the information for a person given should be correct and therefore it must be taken from a reliable source. I therefore find that just for that reason the article like a biography can be removed. Further the viewers will be deprived of.Lakshmikanta Manna (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment it seems there are still some sections that are complete copies of text from other sources, which could indicate a copyright violation. However, it also seems that these passages are being edited. If the copyvio sections persist, the article could definitely be deleted but I'm willing to give the editor a chance for work in progress. Please clean up the direct-copied text at once.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've listed this for evaluation in a week at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2022 May 6. After that point it will be revdeleted/trimmed/deleted as necessary. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]