Talk:M.C. Kids

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cake Mania (series) (0 participants)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Non-NES Versions[edit]

I'm wondering what source was used to say that M.C. Kids was also released on "Game Boy (though only in Europe), Commodore 64, Amiga, and for PCs running MS-DOS". From [1] and [2] it seems that it was only ever made for NES. zzymyn 13:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this sentence, if someone finds a source, add it back. zzymyn 00:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the screen shots of this game at MobyGames Calvero2 18:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the info has been re-added. zzymyn 00:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolute minimum of promotion[edit]

Does "absolute minimum of promotion" usually include television ads? Because there were definitely television ads in France.Medinoc (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Hi guys. I removed[3] claims that are of the nature of a "reception" section. One is about the criticism of the game being an advergame; the statement is part false and part contradictory, contradicted throughout the rest of the article. It's an aimless claim. If these things are true, they can be reinstated with a citation in the Reception section. That's really what should happen, along with reviews of the game that are contemporary to its release. I couldn't find any online just now, and I imagine that they are trapped in dead trees. Maybe we can get a screenshot of a TV advertisement. Thanks! — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 18:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]