Talk:Lumia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 13 February 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 09:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



LumiaLumia (disambiguation)Lumia should redirect to Microsoft Lumia:

  1. REDIRECT Microsoft Lumia

as the term as used nowadays almost always refers to the lineup of smartphones, and other meanings are very little used compared to the smartphone series. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 15:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. Firstly, because a claim that something that is a primary topic should come with evidence of that. Just because something is well-known to you does not mean it is well-known to everyone. Secondly, on grounds of long-term significance. There might be a recent interest, but there is no reason to think that a particular cell phone model will be what people think of long-term on this subject. A Google search for "galaxy" might suggest that galaxy be about the smartphone, but that's clearly not going to happen. One of the other lumias, lumia (citrus), is a type of fruit. When it comes to technology versus fruit, just look where Apple goes, and that's an entire company with more sticking power than a phone model that will probably be rebranded in a few years with a different name. And that's just one of the others. Primary topic considers all of the other uses. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose WP:RECENTISM and electronics-bias and North American bias. Further, the Microsoft phones are rare, and not popular. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as per Egsan Bacon and IP editor. -- P 1 9 9   17:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. In fact, I thought this was originally a misspelling of "Lamia". Steel1943 (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per all above In ictu oculi (talk) 12:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.