This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
FacultiesIntact (talk·contribs) has been paid by stellaresults on behalf of MSKCC. COI disclosed at userpage.
I've been asked to review the article for conformance with Wikipedia's guidelines. I couldn't find any problems with it. Good-quality sources are used, with inline referencing throughout. The text corresponds to what the sources say, and I see no issues with neutrality. As far as notability is concerned, I see no problems either: WP:GNG is clearly met, and from what I can tell (I'm moderately familiar with the field of medicine), it would be at best really hard to argue against notability per WP:NACADEMIC. In particular, I'd say WP:NACADEMIC #1 (The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.) is met.
If I had to assess it, I'd say Start class - definitely not a stub - and perhaps not too far from C class. GregorB (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
