Talk:Lucy Pearson (cricketer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

notability?[edit]

I don't understand cricket, so I may be out of line here, but someone removed the Prod for this article with the edit summary "being a women test cricketer is a clear assertion of notability". How does that assertion make sense? Women can't or don't play cricket? If she's the only one, or one of the few, perhaps a line or two could be added to the article and/or a reference? Otherwise, this is a non-notable person and the article is ripe for AfD. Help me understand? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She represented her country in a major international sport. How can that be anything other than notable? Andrew nixon (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've re-written the article to confirm notability, hope that helps. There is more information about her domestic career which can be added at a later date.–MDCollins (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lucy Pearson (cricketer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]