Talk:Lower Darwen

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disputed[edit]

There is a dispute over whether the article should refer to Lower Darwen as being in Darwen. The evidence for it is claimed to be: "maps, council, county council, Royal Mail districts, google maps, history of darwen/blackburn..."[1].

"Maps, council, county council" and "history of darwen/blackburn" are vague and cannot be used as sources; more specific citations are needed.

Sources: Royal Mail and Google maps both use the postal addresses – somewhere that is part of a postal town is not always part of a town, as there are many exceptions and boundaries to not coincide with settlements or administrative areas. The county council has a page at http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/DarwenComplete_LowRes.pdf about Darwen, and according to that the town includes part of the former Lower Darwen township. More information about this at http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=53116 – it states that Lower Darwen was divided; part was incorporated into Darwen, but a larger area became part of Blackburn. There are boundary maps at http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk which show the former township boundaries, although the site is currently not working.

http://www.blackburn.gov.uk/upload/pdf/Darwen_Electoral_Wards.pdf – Darwen Town Council does not include the wards in which Lower Darwen is located, although the former township included Earcroft. (Is this still considered a part of Lower Darwen?) One of the two wards (Fernhurst, which also includes part of Blackburn) is in the Rossendale and Darwen constituency, although the other (Higher Croft) is in the Blackburn constituency (this can be verified at http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk). snigbrook (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lower Darwen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612215338/http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/DarwenComplete_LowRes.pdf to http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/DarwenComplete_LowRes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lower Darwen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]