Talk:Lou Pearlman/Archives/2017

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Lou Pearlman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Gay allegation

An editor recently placed on the page "a gay allegation" made by an anonymous source in the article below, I would classify it as gossip.

Boy Band Mogul Lou Pearlman's Prison Interview: My Ponzi Scheme Was Smarter Than Madoff’s

The article states.. "A high-ranking former Trans Continental staffer (who asked to remain anonymous to avoid being drawn into any legal disputes)", not to mention Trans Continental is defunct. I think it should be deleted RomanGrandpa (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

I have now reverted the IP twice as the material is a WP:BLP violation. Not only is the material based on rumor, it is derivative of a Vanity Fair article that itself was based on rumor: "The allegations were the focus of the 2007 Vanity Fair exposé "Mad About the Boys," which relied on innuendo and hearsay but contained no first-person accounts of sexual misconduct." I left a final warning on the IP's Talk page. I haven't decided whether I will block the IP if they do it again or ask another administrator to look at it.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


LBGT JEWS category ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:10AD:80E2:43B3:D29D (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)