Talk:Lotus 23

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports Car Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sports Car Racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sports Car RacingWikipedia:WikiProject Sports Car RacingTemplate:WikiProject Sports Car RacingSports Car Racing articles

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this a Lotus 23. The file name hints it's a Lotus 10. // Liftarn

Yes, it appears so. The 4 stud front Wobbly Webs suggest this is a 23 or a 23B, but the difference between these two models (additional structural steel pipes on the sides of the 23B cockpit) cannot be seen in the photo. Driver-side-only roll bar made with very thin (probably 1" diameter) pipes were retrofitted to many 23s, but the roll bar shown in the picture is clearly different, and the lack of a windshield wiper shows the extent of the restoration. Yiba (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am seriously doubting if 23/23B/23C had the same suspension as Lotus 20 as so stated in the article. I am not sure about the original 23, but I used to own/race a 23B, and they (including all other 23B's I have seen) definitely have the top 'I' arm on the rear suspension (which the 20 didn't), and had "Rubber Donuts" on the halfshafts (meaning the suspension does not depend on the halfshaft to keep the geometry as the 20 suspension did). Also, I got acquainted with another owner who installed a set of front suspension arms that he was told to be for 20/22 on his 23B. I could not measure the lower arm, but the top 'V' shaped arm clearly had different dimensions/ratio from the front to the rear tube sections. As a result, there was a large amount of bump steer that could not be dialed out, whereas mine had close to none. I'd appreciate if someone could shed some light on this. Could Setright be mistaken in his book? Yiba (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lotus 23. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]