Talk:Lone Teepee

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles

United States: Old West Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed merge with Battle of the Little Big Horn[edit]

By itself; this article doesn't really give a whole lot. It's briefly mentioned in the one source given and it's hard to search for something like this. I believe it would do much better in the Battle of the Little Big Horn article. The Undead Never Die (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is amazing that this article was created in 2006 and has remained an unimproved stub since. How it has escaped a speedy deletion nomination is equally amazing. If we created (and allowed to remain) articles with only a brief mention in a reference we could have millions of additional articles. I am not actually a deletionist but value their worth on Wikipedia.

This discussion timeline has expired without resolution. This stub could not be logically argued as worthy to occupy article space, by even the most ardent supporter, so I can not imagine a bold moved would have been (or would be) contested. I will submit historical significance of the Lone Teepee (and a half) but it can be covered elsewhere. I have not looked to see if it would be better at the proposed merge location or Battle of the Rosebud, where it receives no prominence, and where a "brief" mention in a reference will suffice for added content. Otr500 (talk) 12:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But how do you merge them? MossyCobble255 (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move text from here to the other article and change this into a redirect. And yes, it should be done.Volunteer Marek (talk) 09:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge - While I am not sure we need all this material merged, it should indeed be merged. Soon. Jus da fax 10:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per above reasoning Liar's Lair (talk) 02:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since consensus was to move (and I agree) I merged info into the Battle of the Little Big Horn article and redirected link there. Thorkall (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]