Talk:Liza Jane (David Bowie song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Bowie Liza Jane.JPG[edit]

Image:Bowie Liza Jane.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move suggestion[edit]

I'd like to suggest moving this article on the Bowie record to a new title, so we could make "Liza Jane" into a general article. There is the standard Li'l Liza Jane of which this is an arrangement. Additionally, there are aspects to "Liza Jane", some of which are currently mentioned in the "Li'l Liza Jane" article but which are tangential. Also, there is an different composition of some note by the same name, "Liza Jane" by Vince Gill.

1) Thoughts on this proposed reworking? 2) Suggestions on the title this could be moved to? "Liza Jane (Davie Jones and the King Bees)" or "Liza Jane (David Bowie record)" are possibilities; any better suggestions? -- Infrogmation (talk) 11:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]