Talk:List of unproven and disproven cancer treatments/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Misinformation in Wikipedia
Quote: "Diet-based Alkaline diet – a restrictive diet of non-acid foods"
Once again Wikipedia is exposed as not having a clue what it is talking about. The alkaline diet specifically recommends acid foods like LEMONS because they are claimed to leave an alkaline residue, known in 'alkaline diet circles' as ASH. The diet is not based on the pH value of a particular food to begin with but rather the effect on a cellular level after digestion. Please understand that I am not trying to say the alkaline diet is valid or invalid – rather, that Wikipedia needs to get its facts straight and not spout misinformed nonsense. In fact lemons are supposed to be one of the most alkalising foods available, according the dietary theory. Whether that is true or not is not the point.
I'm not too sure how to go about correcting this mistake Samsbetter (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- From the Canadian Cancer Society source:
The chemistry of your blood is slightly alkaline, which is the opposite of acidic. Supporters of an alkaline diet believe you should eat food that matches the chemistry of your blood. They say that a high-acid diet upsets the balance of your blood and causes disease over time – so eating a more alkaline diet will protect you from disease.
- Seems clear clear from that this particular form of woo stipulates the eating of alkaline foods, not acid ones. It's a very good source, so duly we reflect it. Alexbrn (talk) 15:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Cancer Research UK is not a valid official institute for declaring anything at all.
Cancer Research UK is not a valid official institute for declaring anything at all. Referring to it only empowers the conspiracy theories about supressing the natural remedies. And it is only one institute. Has it ever done any research on these things? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.21.10.95 (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- See Cancer Research UK. In line with WP:MEDRS, this is one of the most authoritative medical sources on the planet, and in fact they have worked collaboratively with Wikipedia to improve the quality of our articles. Alexbrn (talk) 20:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)