Talk:List of the first women holders of political offices

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title[edit]

The idea of this article is easy to understand, but I can't quite find the right way to phrase the title. Any help appreciated SP-KP 17:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some discussion points[edit]

This article is coming along well. Any views on the following?

  • The article title
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Formatting
  • Referencing
  • Order of entries
  • How we deal with "nonspecific" entries - I've deleted the Afghan & Scottish entries for now, but maybe we should include them?
  • Whether we mention states and/or offices which have not had a female officeholder

--AnselmoD79 07:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this because it is a political party and not a political office. if there is enough interest for political party members then maybe we could do a new section, but right now it seems a bit out of place and dilutes the significance of the page you have made. President of the Christian Democrat Party of Chile|Christian Democrat Party]] - Soledad Alvear - May 2006

SP-KP 13:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title-Difficult to think of a better one. Inclusion criteria, formatting, order-seems fine to me. Referencing-Would be difficult to find external refs, so we are stuck with internal refs. Criteria of mentioning it on the linked page sounds reasonable, but then how do we include people that have no page. Alternatively, if the person is in a list of Ministers, say, and is evidently the first female, that should be ok, even if not mentioned in in the page.
We should allow 'until-contradicted' info, eg I know that Winne Mandela was a minister in the first Mandela Govt, but I do not know, and have no way of finding out, if she was the first female, so I would suggest that she should be added, and if someone else knows better, then they can correct it. As it stands the article sayst that SA has had no female Minister, and that is less correct than saying that Winne Mandela might have been the first.
'Non-specific entries-I only added those as a link to trigger others to look up because I know that Scotland and Afghanistan had female ministers, but don't know who they were, and didn't have time to lookup. Perhpas 'Reqeusts for Info' should be added here on the talk page - see Talk:Families in the Oireachtas for a similiar situation.
Sub-level states eg Wales, Scotland, NI, Uttar Pradesh, all 50 USA states, should probably be left out anyhow, and just stick to 'States' as define in List of state leaders.
If you are leaving out South Africa/Afghanistan, they should be added to the list of 'Other states' --Rye1967 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Other countries[edit]

(This does not belong in the article but is a useful resource for developing it) These countries do not have a female holder of political office listed above. Most of these countries have had women represented in at least one level of government.

Americas[edit]

Europe[edit]

Asia[edit]

Oceania[edit]

Africa[edit]

MOved from article Rich Farmbrough, 10:01 15 July 2008 (GMT).

Functional error[edit]

So all the millions of princesses, empresses, rulers, concubines (sometimes more powerful than the king), trade empire owners, that have existed for (recorded) about 6,000 years all over the world just don't count?

How about the generals who after dying were discovered to be females in "drag".

How about "the veiled sultan", high priestesses (sometimes of sects that absolutely forbid male participation), and assorted other offices all over the world that could ONLY be held by a female?

We sure this article is a keeper? I would put it up for AFD based on simple common sense.Aaaronsmith (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of the first female holders of political offices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]