Talk:List of submarine actions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The final statement, "This was the only time a nuclear submarine has attacked in an act of war." at the end of this article appears incorrect. From the article for the USS_Pittsburgh_(SSN-720), the USS Pittsburgh, a Nuclear Powered SSN-688 "Los Angeles" class ship along with the USS Louisville fired multiple tomahawk cruise missiles in 1991 against Iraq during the Gulf_War. Additionally the USS Pittsburgh again fired cruise missiles against Iraq on April 27, 2003. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tekkris (talkcontribs) 16:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What that editor meant is that it was the first nuclear powered submarine to attack "an enemy ship" in time of war. This list should only contain info about actual naval battles (because they are clearly the most notable) and not info about naval bombardments (which do not tend to be considered notable enough), though I suppose it wouldn't be entirely inapproriate to include some info about the bombardments of land targets. --$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 03:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USS England....[edit]

Should the USS England combat service be included as a submarine action? The article its about submarines, actions, losses ,etc. But the USS England is not a submarine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.118.9.11 (talk) 01:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of submarine actions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]