Talk:List of preserved British Rail diesel locomotives

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Untitled[edit]

Article under construction. Biscuittin (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now completed. Biscuittin (talk) 20:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preserved class lists[edit]

For discussion on preserved class lists see Talk:List of preserved British Rail Class 47 locomotives. Biscuittin (talk) 20:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name of this article[edit]

As this article contains no individual locomotive entries I feel it's name needs revising. (Either that or add the individual loco details to it.) How about List of preserved British Rail diesel locomotive classes? Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Andywebby (talk) 12:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scope[edit]

This article is a list of preserved British Rail diesel locomotives. It has been attracting a great deal of content that did not fit that description, and was rapidly becoming a list of non-steam rail traction of Great Britain. Accordingly, I have removed all of the electric locomotives, the railcars and multiple-units, the non-BR locos and anything that isn't preserved. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In which case I feel the introduction needs to be edited to reflect what you've done as it promises more than it delivers Andywebby (talk) 12:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]