Talk:List of extinction events

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of extinction events article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Extinction Mid‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:List of extinction events is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal List of extinction events is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Late Devonian extinction#Magmatism|Viluy Traps]] Anchor Late Devonian extinction#Magmatism links to a specific web page: Magmatism. The anchor (#Magmatism) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Timeline mislabled[edit]

The scale claims to be labeled years before present, but all the numbers are negative. Negative years before present equals positive years AFTER present which is clearly wrong. I suggest it be re-labeled "years relative to present" to be least confusing. 108.233.124.132 (talk) 01:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Twitter/CalRobert[reply]

I agree. It can be fixed at {{ExtEvent nav}}. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 20:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Volcanic Traps and their associated Large Impact Events[edit]

Looking at Various Volcanic Traps ( sequential lava flows ), at the same time as Large Impact events, the two locations were probably antipodal. The Energy from the Large impact events would refract and reflect inside the Earth and come back to an anti-podal focal point that is located 180 degrees away from the Impact site in all directions. The refocusing of energy will severely fracture the Earth's surface at that point leading to extensive, and repeated lava flows. For example: The Deccan Traps was antipodal to the Chicxulub Impact site when the Impact site was 3 degrees north of the Equator, and the Deccan Traps site was 3 degrees south of the equator, both at 66.043 Ma. Both sites are now far north of the equator, as most of the continents are now north of the equator. A similar antipodal set up would be associated with the Wilkes Land Impact site, and the Siberian Traps at 252.17 Ma. The Impact near to the South Pole, and the Traps near to the North Pole.

This same concept can be applied to the other Impact-Traps extinction events.63.225.17.34 (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Dear (63.225.17.34), I happened to be investigating this very topic a few years back and ran into this article. It may be of interest to you: 
     https://www.princeton.edu/news/2011/10/19/impact-study-princeton-model-shows-fallout-giant-meteorite-strike#top  --Frunobulax (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New research into the Late Devonian extinction[edit]

Can "collapse of ozone layer" be added to "Probable causes" under Late Devonian extinction, per https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/22/eaba0768? —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 20:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event[edit]

Oiyarbepsy has deleted the Deccan Traps as a possible cause of the extinction as "a tiny minority opinion and borderline fringe". This is true as a sole cause, but not as a contributory one. See for example [1] and [2]. Also, the source cited for impact in the article is a book putting forward a fringe theory by an astrophysicist that the impact was caused by dark matter, Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs. I suggest showing impact as the main cause with volcanism as a possible contributory one giving the two sources above as references. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dudley MilesMy original edit did exactly that, described the Deccan Traps as a possible contributor that most scientists reject, but you reverted me. That said, Deccan Traps is a small enough minority view that it doesn't belong here on a list article - on the detailed article about the extinction, sure, but not here.
Also, this entire list is plagued by entries of "thing?" which I don't like because it leaves the reader very little understanding of what that question mark is supposed to represent. I would like to see all of these question marks deleted and replaced with words like hypothesis, fringe theory, possibility, etc. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On your first point, this is your view and not my understanding. The sources I have read mostly say that the bolide was the main cause but not the only one. You need to cite reliable sources, not amend leaving a fringe source as the reference. On your second point, I agree, but again only with citation of reliable sources. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add that a geologic feature is not a cause of an extinction event, but it's formation or it's actions might be. I've reworded the Deccan traps entry accordingly and will review other entries for this flaw. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dudley Miles Can you cite a reliable scientific source that doesn't accept Chicxulub as the cause of the extinction? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So far as I can discover, reliable sources now accept Chicxulub as the primary cause, but some think that the dinosaurs might have survived if it had not coincided with the Deccan Traps. My edit reflects that as it gives Chicxulub unequivocally as the cause. I have deleted "universally accepted" as that would include fringe views. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]