Talk:List of de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter operators

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter operators article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft / Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the airline project.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Article creation[edit]

Dear wikipedians, I’ve created this list-type wikiarticle with the information that was contained (until earlier today) in the Operators section of the article about the Twin Otter. Before doing that I’ve raised the matter in the article’s Talk Page and received favourable feedback.

I’ve based the structure of this list article on the similar one for the Lockheed Constellation; and I haven’t changed the content exported from the source article. Hence… a bit of update of this info may be needed! Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 11:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources, please?[edit]

Hi Wikipedians, I'm trying to add citations for as many entries in this list as possible; and have just tagged the article as "refimprove". Can anyone please point me to verifiable sources that can be used in this task? Either online or printed, if possible in English (also can use sources in Spanish, Italian, French, German or Portuguese). Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been almost three years since the article was tagged and most of the entries are still not referenced and thus fail WP:V. I propose that the unref entries be removed as per policy. Anyone object? - Ahunt (talk) 14:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given that another two years have passed and this article is now a mess of unsourced entries, I think it is time to clean up the airlines without refs cited, as per this consensus. - Ahunt (talk) 22:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Ahunt (talk) 22:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image request[edit]

I have removed the specific request for an image It is requested that an image or photograph of Argentine Twin Otter be included in this article to improve its quality. as we dont have any requirement for specific images on the page as any image of a Twin Otter from any country will do, so clearly not a mattery of article quality. MilborneOne (talk) 15:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft#Twin Otter image request for comment. MilborneOne (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC) [reply]

I agree the request for a specific country is not appropriate. The article has a number of images already, it doesn't need any specific ones unless an explanation as to "why" is provided. - Ahunt (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree, unless there is a verifiably notable reason why Argentine aircraft stand out from the crowd? I don't know of any such reason, mind you. Even then, I would expect any suitable image to be already in use on say the Argentine Air Force article or some such. This is certainly not the place to be pleading for uploads. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter operators. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]