Talk:List of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starList of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign is the main article in the Lists of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign series, a featured topic. It is also part of the Victoria Cross series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 11, 2009Featured list candidatePromoted
September 6, 2009Featured topic candidatePromoted
September 30, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Basuto Wars[edit]

Think that the 1879 VC's listed as the Basuto War are actually the 9th Frontier War. Can anyone confirm? Kernel Saunters (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirm, but refute: Arthur lists them as Moore being the 9th Cape Frontier War (p.114) and the others being the Basuto War (p.129–131). Arthur is seen as being extremely reliable as a source. The 9th Cape Frontier War was against the Gaikas, whereas the Basuto war was on the edge of Natal in Basutoland against the Basutos (according to Arthur, I have no knowledge of the subject). What makes you think otherwise? Woody (talk) 02:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Having dug out the citaition for Peter Brown (VC), the details all suggest the Basuto War. David Underdown (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who took it upon themselves....[edit]

to treat the "colonial" recipients of "separate" medals differently and not include them on this list. Are they of a different quality? There should be a discussion about it here. Albatross2147 (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be me amongst others, and there is a discussion about how separate commonwealth awards should be shown at Talk:List of Australian Victoria Cross recipients#Australian VC. They are separate awards now, and nowhere is colonial mentioned in this list and I resent what you are implying. Regards. Woody (talk) 14:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion should have taken place and a consensus reached. That is the way Wp works. In the public's mind the awards are still the same thing. The military and governments seem to want to maintain all the traditions associated with the "original" medal eg. the pension and salutes. If "commonwealth" and "constitutional and historical ties" are to mean anything then the non-British awards for the same sort of acts and with the same name should be included in the lists albeit with explanatory notes. Of course if the non-British awards are not qualitatively the same then the lists should be separate. I am sorry your feathers have been ruffled - woodpeckers (which I assume the name alludes to) usually don't have feelings :-) In any event Admins should not be thin skinned let their dudgeon get too high. Albatross2147 (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All discussion moved to Talk:List of Australian Victoria Cross recipients#Australian VC. Thanks, Woody (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Murray, 8th Earl of Dunmore[edit]

He seems to be missing Kernel Saunters (talk) 10:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found him, he's listed as Alexander Fincastle Kernel Saunters (talk) 10:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flawn[edit]

We have Flawn as serving in the Basuto War. He seems to have actually served in the the Sekukuni Campaign, a distinct conflict unrelated to the Basuto War? Anyone got sources to confirm? Kernel Saunters (talk) 10:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]