Talk:List of Playboy videos

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

Why is Wikipedia advertising for Playboy???

Wikipedia does not advertise; Wikipedia does, however, document notable commercial products from a neutral point of view because such products are a significant part of the world. If you think that the tone of this article has strayed away from an objective description into a promotional or fan perspective, feel free to edit it accordingly. Postdlf 23:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do edit the article if you think you can improve it, it has still not been completed yet. Jester2001 23:00, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Major Edit[edit]

I've removed vast chunks of the article. Some comments were explicitly there too promote the videos in my opinion. Some may argue I have ripped the guts out of this article, but I believe I have not. If you want changes, please post your changes/additions here so we can view them in an objective manner. Thanks - Welshy 01:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Many Errors[edit]

The current article appears to have many errors that I'd like to correct, but I'm new to Wikipedia, and before rewriting major chunks throughout, I'd like to ask something... specifically, I'm not sure how Wikipedia's policy against original research applies here -- if I correct something based on my viewing of the videos, is that "original research" when it's a matter of fact, verifiable by watching the videos? Should I cite the videos as a source? Thanks! Efindel 20:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right... I decided to do as the Wikipedia advice says and "be bold". Changes made. Efindel 16:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the list?[edit]

Why is this called "List of Playboy videos"? All I see is a general overview of the various video lines. A list article should actually feature an itemized list of every release with release dates, etc. If there's no desire to add such a list, fine, but the article needs to be renamed in order to maintain consistency with other Wikipedia list articles (particularly filmographies and TV episode lists, which are the closest analogs to something like this. I might flag this article for a rename to Playboy Video. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erasure[edit]

Can someone please fix the Video Centerfold section? I accidentally deleted a small part of it and I don't know what it is. Sorry about that.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 03:50, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]