Talk:List of Apollo mission types
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was MERGE, which I began performing very recently per the process outlined at WP:MERGE. I have also taken care to qualify throughout the various edit summaries and talk pages that my edits related to the proposal have not been simple copy-paste actions of the old article/section, but have also introduced significant changes. I have not preserved all information from the old article (a concern raised by Randy Kryn), but I believe the merge is a fair representation and rephrase of the previously existing article. If any user has an outstanding concern about the merge, I encourage them to check my recent editing history (which I plan to include several edits relating to the ongoing merge) or to augment this page as needed.MinnesotanUser (talk) 01:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Merge proposal[edit]
This is a small article – too small to justify its existence as a separate article instead of as a helpful context section in List of Apollo missions, à la List of Space Shuttle missions § Flight numbering. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 05:46, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support if no information is lost in the merge. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support I think this is a fine idea. Kees08 (Talk) 14:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support (thirded); this article's content can readily be done there as a section. Moreover, I note in passing (note to self, others) that the present article's content can be cited via the explanation of mission types in Cortright, Apollo Expeditions to the Moon (recent 50th Ann. re-issue), Dover, 172 among other sources. I have no immediate plans to propose/work up an edit to this effect but I'll think about it (what is the larger process for this sort of thing?)MinnesotanUser (talk) 08:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support I think this is a fine idea. Kees08 (Talk) 14:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.