Talk:List of 2 ft 3 in gauge railways

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cuban sugar industrial railways: 700mm by definition[edit]

The article now mentions Cuban sugar tracks, as mentioned in [1], (with live steam in 2003!), being a 27+12 inches (698.50 mm) gauge. As Aron-Tripel pointed out [2] (source contradiction), the gauge was the 700 mm (2 ft 3+916 in) (metric) definition. I edited the article here. Cuba was a Spanish colony, and Spain went metric (from local units) after 1852. That is to say: Spain never used imperial units at home, and probably did not in their colonies. Therefor we can conclude for now that the gauge was defined metric, 700mm. -DePiep (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of 2 ft 3 in gauge railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]