Talk:Liopleurodon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liopleurodon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Liopleurodon received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Liopleurodon is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the Walking with Dinosaurs Liopleurodon[edit]

I think that tidbit needs just a little more elaboration, due to the common misconception that the great size was based on "The Monster of Aramberri". It's stated in the tie-in book Walking with Dinosaurs The Evidence on page 80 that the gigantic Liopleurodon was based on a large pliosaur vertebra from Oxford Clay described by David Martill and Collin McHenry in 1996 (https://archive.org/details/walkingwithdinos00mart/page/104/mode/2up) which was initially thought to have come from a pliosaur 17-20 meters in length (https://reptilis.net/DML/1996Oct/msg00231.html), and for WWD, they speculated based on those estimates that even larger specimens could have existed, leading to the 25-meter Liopleurodon in "Cruel Sea".

In 2009, Colin McHenry reexamined the ‘Peterborough vertebra’ (PETMG R272) in his lengthy paper "Devourer of Gods" and gave it a smaller estimate of 11.6–14.2 meters (mean estimate, 12.6 m) on page 437 and cautioned how unreliable size estimates based on fragmentary material can be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.228.107.227 (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Extinct"[edit]

How is it that the word "extinct" doesn't appear anywhere in the article except as part of the title of a footnote? I realize it's WP policy to use the present tense "is" in describing what an item is (not sure where "was" comes in), but from what I gather, no Liopeurodons are living in the present day. Manys (talk) 00:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is pretty heavily implied by saying it lived during the Middle Jurassic, which means not now. If there were any theories about this particular genus's extinction, that could be covered, of course. FunkMonk (talk) 00:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ShawnBoom. Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More Popular Culture[edit]

One is featured in PRIMAL S1E10. Drsruli (talk) 04:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had thought that there was a popular culture section for this article. I'll leave this suggestion for such time as one may be added. Drsruli (talk) 05:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:trivia. FunkMonk (talk) 12:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As was repeatedly previously explained to you, "In Popular Culture" sections should be discussions about media depictions impacting the way the public perceives the topic in question, and should not be trivia laundry lists of "spot the monster of the week," especially if the featured subject is not important to either the franchises mentioned or the episode they star in.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More than any other single item currently listed in the category on this article, absolutely, without a doubt. (And in an absolute sense, yes, of course it was important in that episode.) Drsruli (talk) 01:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't discuss or explain its relevance to the plot, let alone discuss or explain how its role in that episode is impacting how popular culture views Liopleurodon, then it is probably not notable enough to mention.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"While fishing, Spear and Fang encounter a bound and bald-headed tall woman with a scorpion tattoo on the back of her head fleeing from a Liopleurodon which Spear kills." The animal is directly involved in the plot. Not a main character, but the focus of attention for about a minute. It also fights with the tyrannosaur. The animal is easily recognizable as a Liopleurodon. Drsruli (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, less than 5% of the episodes 22 minute runtime? That is hardly significant. Focusing on the ngram results [1] Liopleurodon was clearly thrust into the public consciousness by it's massively oversized appearance in Walking With Dinosaurs, which is probably the only "in popular culture" thing maybe worth mentioning. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:23, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that fiction and nonfiction representations shouldn't be compared. Is there a fiction film or TV where a Liopleurodon plays a larger part? (There probably is, though, right?) Drsruli (talk) 04:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, for one, I don't believe the Primal pliosaur is ever stated to be Liopleurodon within the show (admittedly because the show doesn't have dialogue). Two, I think one of the problems with "In Popular Culture" section is that that phrasing implies that the section should be a compendium of appearances in popular media. A better heading title would be "Cultural impact", which is specifically meant to tackle the media or other pop culture forces which have brought an animal into public perception. If we can find a good source on the topic, I wouldn't be opposed to bringing up how the idea of pliosaurs as big blue-and-white superpredators is directly a result of the WWD Liopleurodon. The Primal depiction seems to be a follower of that public perception, not a trailblazer. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the first point, it is identified as Liopleurodon in the secondary sources. (And within the show, it's depicted clearly enough, that it could not be confused with another genus.) Drsruli (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like Pliosaurus or Kronosaurus?--Mr Fink (talk) 02:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it could be confused for those (or by the right observer, for anything). (A hyperbolic statement of original research on my part.) Nevertheless, it has been identified as Liopleurodon. Drsruli (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]