Talk:Lexical functional grammar
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
Why don't we create an article for "Looking for Group" and remove the irrelavant line related to it? I thought creating a disamiguation page for LFG and remove the line but I gave it up finally, for "Looking for Group" is too less representative for LFG in general. The result could be disappointing for ones who wish to have a line for "Looking for Group" in the LFG article, but at least they will have access using the "Looking for Group" query.
Quality Issues[edit]
This is not a good explanation.
Its target audience appears to be those who already know quite a bit about the current way of studying languages amongst the "intelligentsia".
However, while one can explain an engine to a mechanic very succinctly; the rest of us would be baffled by the terminology, even if we could otherwise grapes the concepts.
I believe Wikipedia is intended to inform the public, not become a private enrichment for the initiated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.114.248.239 (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)