Talk:Lestovka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright[edit]

Good image from LOC [1] but it's freshly scanned, and somehow Novosibirsk State Museum of Regional History and Folk Life has it copyrighted, how about fair use it, this link mentions that? –Gnomz007(?) 20:33, 13 August 2005 (UTC) Actually I have an idea about exploiting Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. - the sorce image is from 1926 - no copyright outside SU.–Gnomz007(?) 22:01, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An image of a PD art can be be protected by copyright only if there is any art involved in the image production, like photo-artist collage, etc. They may claim whatever they want but this is PD. I will add it to the article. --Irpen 23:59, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, those museums tend to copyright everything, maybe in ex-SU that means something –Gnomz007(?) 00:19, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

beads rope Chotki[edit]

English Wiki sometimes confronts you with interesting philosophical issues, often far deeper than those one would expect to ponder.

I see a major consistency issue in prayer beads rosary prayer rope aka Chotki Chotki (четки/Ukrainian чотки) is prayer beads, currently redirects to prayer rope has an accurate descriprtion of lestovka, well chotki is a general word for both beads and rope. Many English articles refer to lestovka as beads or rosary (which is for which it is used, but not exactly), and lestovka is aka vertsvitsa [2]. I will do the following:

  1. Chotki need to be redirected to prayer beads
  2. mention removed from prayer rope
  3. the Ukrainian article interwikied to prayer beads

The most difficult one is the decision what to do with the rest so there will be no confusion–Gnomz007(?) 02:16, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lestovka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]