Talk:Lead acetate

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move to Lead(II) acetate[edit]

No consensus --Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 17:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rename page to Lead(II) acetates

Support[edit]

Lead(II) acetate is the precise chemical name. And, of course, a redirect must be set up from Lead acetate (since that is the most common name), just like copper sulfate redirects to copper(II) sulfate. (Currently, there are two articles (Lead(II) acetate and Lead acetate), one of them should be removed by all means.) -- Azazell0 08:32, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

"Lead acetate" gets 25 times as many google hits, so it appears to be the most common name. Niteowlneils 23:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. This would be a case for WP:DA. violet/riga (t) 14:08, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.