Talk:Le Bourgeois gentilhomme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Capitalisation[edit]

I struggle with French capitalisation conventions. Why would an adjective (Bourgeois) be capitalised but the noun to which it refers (gentilhomme) not be? — Jack of Oz [your turn] 03:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Different countries capitalize — and spell — differently. My French is weak-to-very-weak, but I have a friend in Brussel whom I just e-mailed your question. — Robert Greer (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've referred the question to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2011 April 19#French capitalisation of adjectives and nouns in titles. The discussion is ongoing, but the information so far strongly suggests that any translation that assumes, as I did, that "Bourgeois" is an adjective and "gentilhomme" is a noun, is 180 degrees wrong. It's not about a gentleman who happens to be bourgeois; it's about a member of the Bourgeoisie who happens to be a gentleman – a gentlemanly bourgeois, if you like, not a bourgeois gentleman. Hard to express that in English, I know. This will, or should, have some ramifications for our article. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Drama in their list of works by Molière capitalizes it as Le bourgeois gentilhomme and translate it as The Bourgeois Gentleman. Grove Music Online and The New Grove Dictionary of Opera capitalize it the same (but do not translate). The usual Wikipedia policy is to follow the practice found in standard English sources. --Robert.Allen (talk) 07:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The word "gentilhomme" is a noun (see here), while "bourgeois" is used as either an adjective or a noun (see here). The McGraw-Hill tranlation would seem to be OK. --Robert.Allen (talk) 07:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Le Bourgeois gentilhomme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Translation[edit]

There is only one translation of the title of this play that I have seen at all commonly, and that is "The Would-be Gentleman". Yet (bizarrely, it seems to me) that is not among the translations mentioned in the lede.JBritnell (talk) 14:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]