Talk:Lapsus

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

I don't see why not, they are the same topic, just different names. 64.178.96.166 05:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Jarrod[reply]

No. Definitely not. "Popularization of the term has diluted its technical meaning in some contexts to include any slip-of-the-tongue phenomenon, often in an attempt by the user to humorously assign hidden motives or sexual innuendo to the mistake."

This clearly explains that a Freudian Slip is not just a mistake in speaking or memory. Ibemonty2000 05:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haplologies[edit]

Clicking the "Haplologies" link, it seems they are something quite different to what this page describes them as. 83.151.195.33 (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC) --I (anon) noticed this too; the definition of haplology is different on the haplology page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.128.205 (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado?[edit]

"I'll explain this tornado later" - don't get that one. Peridon (talk) 13:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]