Talk:Laguna (province)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

WikiProject Philippine LGUs

Wondering how to edit the article? The WikiProject Philippine LGUs could be of help. :)

Los Baños Special Science and Nature City

On August 7, 2000, Los Baños was declared as a "Special Science and Nature City of the Philippines" through Presidential Proclamation No. 349 in recognition as a center for science and technology in the development of agriculture and preservation of the environment.

This does not make Los Baños as a city however. The bill required for it to be converted to a component city like Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, was stalled in congress prior to P.D. 349. Also, not even a plebiscite was held. Los Baños does not satisfy legal conditions, under the local government code, to be officially a city and is not even in any listing of cities of the Philippines. Meynardtengco 18:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal laguna.png

Image:Ph seal laguna.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


— Save_Us_229 22:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Please edit

Kindly revise TRACE Aquatic Center to: TRACE Aquatic Sports Complex and TRACE College —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.214.99 (talk) 03:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 12:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Laguna (province) → Province of Laguna – Proposing change because of incorrect and inappropriate naming of this article. Also, this proposed name was also used in some legal documents and on its official site. Kiddie Techie (talk) 07:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Oppose. Article titles policy of Wikipedia gives the instruction to name articles based on their common names. The article about Kentucky isn't titled as Commonwealth of Kentucky because that is the official name of the state. Same concept applies here too. In this case, since there are far more than one article is pointed to Laguna, it was disambiguated from the other articles titled as Laguna by putting it as a (province).
Also, please be reminded that you cannot move articles just because you like it, like the one you did in Isabela (province). Please contact people at Tambayan Philippines for more information about naming Philippine provinces.--— JL 09 talkcontribs    10:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Oppose: People refer to the province as "Laguna" in everyday speech (WP:COMMONNAME). For example, "I am going to Laguna." No one would say "I am going to the Province of Laguna." Hence "Laguna" with the disambiguator is the proper name. –HTD 03:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uplb-humanities-bldg.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Uplb-humanities-bldg.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Green Rizal Shrine.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Green Rizal Shrine.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 4 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. RioHondo makes a strong argument against moving that has not been countered. Jenks24 (talk) 12:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


– As per WP:NCDAB which states natural disambiguation > comma disambiguation > parenthetical disambiguation. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Support Laguna, natural. Not sure re Aurora. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose, in the case of "Aurora, Philippines", it is still quite ambiguous because it takes on the form reserved for cities and municipalities (comma convention) and we have two for Aurora: Aurora, Isabela and Aurora, Zamboanga del Sur. The current disambiguation not only makes it clearer, its also consistent with WP:MOSPHIL. Although i do think if there was a natural disambiguation for our provinces, then it would be at <Provincename> Province like Aurora Province. :)--RioHondo (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Agree with RioHondo. Parenthetical disambiguation is clearer and in line with MOSPHIL. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 03:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Laguna (province). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Laguna (province). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Laguna (province). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Laguna has its official hymn/march and its nickname

My fellow Wikipedians,

Laguna has its official march. It is called "Martsa ng Laguna", a official hymn/march of the province. It is true, because there is some sources about this march and its nickname. Its has its nickname: Detroit of the Philippines. It has sources too. This hymn/march is found on YouTube. Its nickname was mentioned on any sources about the province. I am very good at history and geography. Thank you. Rdp060707 (talk) 07:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

I doubt that "Detroit of the Philippines" is an official nickname (Detroit is a city and this is a province...). Anyone can give anything a nickname, but before we add it here, it needs to be a generally-accepted nickname with references from reliable sources. It doesn't matter how good you are in history and geography, it is WP policy to add proper references. Thank you. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Laguna_(province)/Archive_1&oldid=1132050259"