Talk:Labisia pumila

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What does "restore womenhood" mean? I'm also confused by the meaning of "female version". Does that imply that the plant species has 2 different names, depending on whether the individual plant is male or female? Or that the plant has uses for women, that are analogous to the uses of Tongkat Ali by men? This article is kind of a mess, but I'm not familiar at all with the topic, to be able to help fix it. --Booch (talk) 21:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holy anorexic cow on a tightrope, this. So much questionable information within this entry.
.
Just to quickly list some points in need of improvement:
- The "female version" part. Why? Who the f* wrote that? Or is it how LP is commonly viewed in Malaysia, an 'equivalent' of tongkat ali? That's silly, but mention it then.
- The *suspicious* lack of coverage on LP's extensive usage in labor or birthing process.
- The fact that it's commonly brought by people returning from Hajj.
- The lack of mention about its usage in its whole, dried form.
.
- Lastly, but the most importantly, the lack of Indonesian sources. No Indonesian common name, despite it being very well known in Indonesia too? No elaboration on the 'indigenous Malaysian' part, from which kind of source is that factoid taken whether historical records or genetic analysis etc? No mention on the toxicity, controversy, and the myriad of researches on it? All of this issue would be fixed easily by adding Indonesian sources. (This was assuming the Malaysian populace have stopped using LP entirely, which is the reason an unanswered question from 2009 still applies to this day. If that's not the case, then you're welcome to also add Malaysian sources by any means.) - 180.248.8.234 (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labisia pumila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]