Talk:Kruppel-like factors

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

This looks like it is cribbed from someone's review paper. For instance the text refers to Figures 1A-C and at no time in the revision history can I find a Figure 1. In addition only KLF4 and KLF5 are discussed at any length - at last count there were 24, and KLF1 (erythroid) is clearly as important if not more than KLF5. Someone who knows about these factors needs to bring this page up to snuff. 129.176.151.9 (talk) 01:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)BloodDoc[reply]

Requested move 12 August 2019 (outcome: no move)[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kruppel-like factors → Sp/KLF family – merged the small one with the good name into the big one with the bad name Artoria 2e5 🌉 04:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 09:17, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Checking the article's own references, there is a tendency to use 'Kruppel-like factors' with or without the umlaut to refer to this concept. I don't perceive such wide currency for the term 'Sp/KLF' though others may have more knowledge of this. EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I'm sorry but no valid rationale has been given for this move, and the comment above provides a valid reason not to move. It's been rellsted once so let us move on. Andrewa (talk) 11:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.