Talk:King of Rama

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal King of Rama is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

country[edit]

This is not true: A country called Rama never existed; the title of King of Rama became incorporated into the royal style of the Hungarian monarchs due to some kind of misunderstanding.[1] It is totaly false. Rama is land or historical region (approximately in northern Herzegovina) around similar river Rama.

Can you say Burgundy or Normandie never existed?!?

Matej Škarica

Burgundy and Normandy did exist as countries (see Kingdom of Burgundy, Duchy of Burgundy, County Palatine of Burgundy and Duchy of Normandy). The Kingdom of Rama did not. I'll replace the word country with the word state to make the sentence more clear, although the source itself uses the word country. Surtsicna (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

States?? Do not impose your ignorance as fact. Look for the Bela II. and III. (XII. century) »Bela Dei gracia Hungariae Ramaeque rex«. Also: http://www.rama-prozor.info/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2992&Itemid=2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.138.116.66 (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you don't impose your incivility as something acceptable here because it's not acceptable, especially not when it's the first time you converse with someone. Who are you to call someone ignorant? The article cites sources for its claims and you don't. The web-page you cite does not say that Rama was a state. For some reason, Wikipedia is more inclined to trust Pál Engel, Andrew Ayton, and others than you. Surtsicna (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]