Talk:Khokababu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Khokababu.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Khokababu.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khokababu movie poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Khokababu movie poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Khokababu movie poster.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Professional reviews template![edit]

 Professional reviews
Review scores
Source Rating
Gomolo.com
Subham Bhattacharya
The Times of India
Burrp
Sohom Pramanick
Gomolo.in
Washington Bangla Radio USA

I'll delete the "Professional reviews" section within next few days unless 1) sources are provided 2)it is made clear who are these reviewers– Subham Bhattacharya, Sohom Pramanick etc? The only notable reviewer I can find there is Times of India. WBRi and Gomolo are not notable enough to be included as reviewers. I'll not delete it right now. I'll wait for few days at least. If anyone has any comment, (s)he can post here!--Tito Dutta 22:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Almost 1 month, I have removed this portion! --Tito Dutta 21:37, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]