The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
@Number 57: asked me on my talk page to revert my recent edit. I will reply here since this is where the discussion should be. There are other things wrong, the infobox says Israel, the pushpin map is Israel, the Green Line doesn't have a salient. In general I think the edit warring (57 and Dan, outside 24 hours but still edit warring, the other two articles as well that are currently under discussion at Dan's talk page) should stop until we actually do have a "clear consensus". Selfstudier (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I request that you undo your edit. There is a clear consensus at Dan's talk page that the description of the site being in the Latrun salient is correct. Number57 12:46, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I refer you to my comment above. Selfstudier (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And I refer you to the talk page where there is a clear consensus that the article should describe the village as being in the salient. Number57 12:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have copied the ongoing discussion from Dan Palraz talk page to the Latrun salient talk page. Selfstudier (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm guessing that the reference is to ΕΡΥΤΑ (Eruta? No Kfar, but there seems to be KA and some missing letters) that appears on the west side of Jerusalem. The map is way out of scale and while Kfar Ruth is midway between Jerusalem and the sea, ΕΡΥΤΑ is marked only about 1/10 of the way. So calling it the same place is wishful thinking. Zerotalk 04:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After further investigation, Kafr Rut is identified with Khirbat Kafr Lut (mandate map spelling) which is right beside this place. I'll add a source. Moreover, the missing letters are just enough to spell Capheruta, which is how several sources interpret it. Zerotalk 05:18, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
