Talk:Ker-Optika bt v ÀNTSZ Dél- dunántúli Regionális Intézete

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hungary

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the content flagged for copyright is the judgment of the case. This is similar to that of the case of Keck and Mithouard which also has a page on Wikipedia, with the judgement copied from the same official website. To reword the judgment would be wrong due to many students etc looking to directly quote judgments. If I add a citation, would this be sufficient? --Iloveart&law (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution notice[edit]

This article contains text copied from EUR-Lex which allows re-use of the material for commercial or non-commercial purposes. ... discospinster _talk 20:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because the text copied is the judgment of a case. This is the same with every case on Wikipedia; they all have the official judgments copied word for word. Judgments cannot be written in other words. --Iloveart&law (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]