Talk:Karnak

Ancient Egypt: Egyptian religion Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Top-importance).

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

needs more[edit]

Karnak is one of the greatest wonders of the world there should be more information than this on it. I added a little about the columns, architraves and obelisk but I'm sure there is much more to it including at least one other obelisk. I think it has a smaller one still standing and perhaps the twin to the larger one fallen down. I cited 2 sources which covers most if not all of what I added but the part about statues in the temple of mut came from notes it may have been from the seventy wonders of the world or a TV show from the history channel. I'll check back but if anyone else has anything to add please do so.

Zacherystaylor (talk) 05:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't agree with you more... I live here in Luxor and feel that there is insufficient information but my biggest problem is that the entries in other languages bear no resemblance to the English version, can we not standardise? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Merlin-UK (talk • contribs) 14:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Art & Architecture of Egypt - Seidel, Mathias; Schulz, Regine; 2005 Tandem Verlag GmbH - ISBN 3-8331-1424-X: Refers to this as the Temple "City" of Karnak and states that the first Pharaoh to build here was Senusret I [1971 BC to 1926 BC] the temple dedicated to "Month", now known as Montu, who was the original local deity.

See Senusret I, where it states - A shrine (known as the White Chapel) with fine, high quality reliefs of Senusret I, was built at Karnak to commemorate his Year 30 jubilee. It has subsequently been successfully reconstructed from various stone blocks discovered by Henri Chevrier in 1926. Finally, Senusret remodelled the Temple of Khenti-Amentiu Osiris at Abydos, among his other major building projects.

Some of the key members of the court of Senusret I are known. The vizier at the beginning of his reign was Intefiqer, who is known from many inscriptions and from his tomb next to the pyramid of Amenemhat I. He seems to have held this office for a long period of time and was followed by a vizier named Senusret. Two treasurers are known from the reign of the king: Sobekhotep (year 22) and Mentuhotep. The latter had a huge tomb next to the pyramid of the king and he seems to have been the main architect of the Amun temple at Karnak. Merlin-UK (talk) 20:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"It is believed to be the third most visited historical site in Egypt, second only to the Giza Pyramids near Cairo" - Obvious contradiction there. Is it 2nd or 3rd? Fig (talk) 18:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Karnak[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Karnak which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.bible-history.com/past/temple_amun_karnak.html
Triggered by \bbible\-history\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karnak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.karnak3d.net/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090928131107/http://www.remains.se/picturem.php?ObjectID=129&Browse=AREA to http://remains.se/picturem.php?ObjectID=129&Browse=AREA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Karnak Temples.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of name[edit]

According to the introduction, "The Karnak complex gives its name to the nearby, and partly surrounded, modern village of El-Karnak, 2.5 kilometres (1.6 miles) north of Luxor." But the section "Name" says the reverse, "The complex's modern name "Karnak" comes from the nearby village of el-Karnak, which means "fortified village" ". Which is correct? Is the temple complex named for the village, or did the complex give its name to the village? SRamzy (talk) 11:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Name" section is correct - the modern name for the temple comes from the village. Thanks, I will fix the intro. Merytat3n (talk) 21:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]