Talk:Kalyan taluka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Pahari Sahib, can you follow the instructions on the template I put on the above article ("If this text is in the public domain, or is already under a license suitable for Wikipedia: Explain this on this article's discussion page, with reference to evidence")? Also, if the text is indeed in the public domain, can you put Template:Source-attribution on the article and the talk page? Thanks, Theleftorium 21:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay
Firstly -
Actually look at Wikipedia:Copyrights#UK_Copyright, (this is a British Publication written over a hundred years ago on behalf of a now defunct state) (The Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition is also out of copyright for similar reasons)
The Writers Copyright Association as well as the UK Copyright service has a good summary.
The legal basis is the 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, and subsequent modifications and revisions, details at Jenkins IP In particular for literary, artistic works, copyright ends 70 years after the last surviving author dies or if unknown, 70 years after creation or publication.
The UK Office of Public Sector Information, formerly HMSO, has told us:
Crown copyright protection in published material lasts for fifty years from the end of the year in which the material was first published. Therefore material published [fifty-one years ago], and any Crown copyright material published before that date, would now be out of copyright, and may be freely reproduced throughout the world.[1]
Secondly look here - of interest is the "Possible copyright status" which reads "NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT", you can get to this page by clicking the link in this URL (this was the URL listed in the "copyvio")
Thirdly look at these images - all PD-old.
Fourthly look at Wikipedia:Public domain, "In the U.S., any work published before January 1, 1923 anywhere in the world is in the public domain" (If published before 1909, such works are in the public domain in the U.S. )
To surmise, according to UK copyright law this is a PD publication, according to US law this is in the Public Domain.In addition may I add I have used info from the IGI in many other article without issue. Pahari Sahib 08:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, Pahari Sahib. I completely misinterpreted the Wikipedia:Public domain article. I'm very sorry for the misunderstanding, and I should have checked the link here more carefully (and probably have asked a more experienced user first). I'll remove the the copyvio template and put Template:Source-attribution on the talk page and in the article. Again, I'm sorry (I'll try not to let it happen again). Theleftorium 13:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay :-) Pahari Sahib 13:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalyan taluka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]