Talk:Just Say No/Archives/2012

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Why the POV?

"any other condemnable idea/entity that one group supposed it was plausible to "say no" to"

sounds funny. To suppose something is plausible is ridiculous. Basically the author is saying that he thinks the whole campaign was based on the ridiculous presumption that we should say no to certain things. I'm changing it.

I like the new wording better so I see no reason to change it, but I believe the original author was trying to convey that the issues that were commonly targeted by "just say no" campaigns were not the sort that could be solved by simply saying no. - Kuzain 06:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)