Talk:Jules Eden

"Whitewash"?

In 11 August, I revised an article about Julian Eden, a doctor, a broadcaster, an internet businessman and a SCUBA and dive advocate. In 2009, Eden was deregistered by the GMC - this was mentioned in my edit.

On the 17th, Interrapax an edit to my article which, in the History page, he called a 'whitewash'. I have had to recast his edits for the following reasons:

- Eden is a living subject.

- His deregistration is currently the subject of an ongoing appeal case in the UK High Court.

Wikipedia has precise guidelines regarding contentious issues, especially if they are potentially defamatory and the subject of ongoing legal processes.

I have NOT cut Interrapax's edits. I have simply trimmed just two of them to avoid repetition and to respect the Wiki guidelines outlined above. I hope this will satisfy him. Hubertgrove (talk) 21:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Hubertgrove, my main concern (and the reason that I used the term "Whitewash") was that the deregistration- which is a very important issue was removed from the lede and reduced to barely half a sentence in the text. Now when I originally came to this page and made the first edits I found a load of badly written CV type stuff. So the first thing I did was a google search for Jules Eden. The majority of hits came back as articles in response to his deregistration. By removing the mention of this issue to this degree, and simply saying that his practive was "controversial" it appears to be minimising what is a highly notable issue for this individual. In fact, without the coverage of his deregistration I would seriously question whether or not he meets the notability criteria for Wikipedia. I understand that yes, BLP applies, however I do not believe that it is fair coverage of the issue to minimise it to such a degree. If you want I'm happy to take this to BLP noticeboard for outside input. Interrapax (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jules Eden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://caredirectory.cqc.org.uk/caredirectory/searchthecaredirectory.cfm?widCall1=customWidgets.content_view_1&cit_id=1-101727810&element=REGISTER&page=1-116522797
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107071618/http://divernet.com/other_diving_topics/reviews/1356948/faq_dive_medicine_by_dr_oliver_firth_jules_eden.html to http://www.divernet.com/other_diving_topics/reviews/1356948/faq_dive_medicine_by_dr_oliver_firth_jules_eden.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009184623/http://london.londinium.com/72774/ to http://london.londinium.com/72774/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)