Talk:Juilliard v. Greenman

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Numismatics: American currency Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American currency task force.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Gerard N. Magliocca, A New Approach to Congressional Power: Revisiting the Legal Tender Cases, 95 Geo. L.J. 119 (2006) (subscription required)
Ali Khan, The Evolution of Money: A Story of Constitutional Nullification, 67 U. Cin. L.Rev. 393 (1999) (also at SSRN (subscription required))
Robert J. Reinstein, The Aggregate and Implied Powers of the United States, 69 Am. U. L.Rev. 3 (2019)
Christopher M. Bruner, The Changing Face of Money, 30 Rev. Banking & Fin. L. 383 (2010)

Prior court cases of the 8-1 opinion[edit]

"resting largely on prior court cases" What cases?

I would like to see more support provided in this section because of the dissent section being more substantial leaves the article feeling a bit biased towards theories that the court had made an error.71.223.70.120 (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-done I've added a phrase identifying the more important case. I agree the article could use further fleshing out. I've added some {{refideas}} above, but this area of law is not my area of expertise, and I'm reluctant to revise the article much prior to familiarizing myself with the doctrinal points at issue. TJRC (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]