Talk:John Stalker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Terrorist or Freedom Fighter[edit]

"suspension from duty and removal from the inquiry in 1986, based on false allegations" - this claim, the sue of the word 'false', has no supporting evidence, yet is clearly defamatory and should be clarified. The entire article is clearly bias and reads very much like an extract from Stalker's book. Ian Hampson, England, March 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.254.201.36 (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The second line of the first paragraph in this article could be viewed as POV: -

a police investigation into the shootings of a number of Irish Republican terrorist suspects by the Royal Ulster Constabulary in 1983.

Remerbering that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, i would suggest that this paragraph be rewritten as: -

a police inversigation into the shootings of a number of suspected members of the Irish Republican Army by the Royal Ulster Constabulary in 1983. Itsmjlynch 12:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This article reads as if its written by his mum. Please look at more serious articles to see how it can avoid soiunding like a CV. Victuallers (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Stalker was sent to look into a shoot to kill policy by the RUC. He asked to many tricky questions. He was subsequently vilified by many including his boss "god's copper" James Anderton. This article is nothing like written by his mum. I think it is insulting to a good upright honest policeman. It is very easy to be photographed in a room with a known criminal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.24.4 (talk) 05:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on John Stalker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Stalker Inquiry[edit]

First sentence of this section completely loses its way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:B460:CE00:FC50:C00F:B621:8178 (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]