This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Interesting fellow. Good Tory. 195.194.75.209 17:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This fellow was a blatant careerist. There was a good deal of information already up about him which appears to have been lifted from the Monday Club circulars at the time of elections for Club office, which had a wide circulation. It is all credible so why has it been deleted? Moreover, why has his little take-over bid of the Monday Club been so selectively sourced, and cited. The articles he wrote demonstrate just what a hypocrite, like John Bercow, that Pinniger was. Did he have any principles at all? Can you locate a source which says he had? 81.151.89.176 17:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Too right. Pinniger failed in his take-over bid so decided if he couldn't be the King then he'd rubbish the whole show. He's an obvious creep. 81.131.63.137 14:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page should be deleted. The subject has never even held national office, and is just a political activist. --SandyDancer 02:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
