Talk:Johannesburg Mountain

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What's the correct high of the mountain?

  * The map distributed at the North Cascades National Park gives "8200 ft / 2499 m"
  * SummitPost.org gives "8200 ft / 2499 m"
  * PeakBagger gives "8200+ feet, 2499+ meters"
  * Bivouac.com gives "2505 m (8219 ft)"

I'm changing high in the article from "8,220 ft (2,506 m)" to 8200/2499 as it seems to be the more commonly given value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Math2000 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]