This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
I am of the opinion that we should use either she/her or they/their, and not mix them throughout the article. My vote would be for she/her as it matches how Li is referred to by others quoted in the article, and can be slightly easier to read in certain sentences (where others are referred to as well as Li). Given the actor uses both she/her and they/their herself/themself, I have changed the article to read she/her. Poojean (talk) 10:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can we form some sort of consensus here? Any other opinions on this? Otherwise I will keep consistent as she/her - it matches the quoted text in the article - I have no axe to grind about it though. Poojean (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change the title of linked articles - we shouldn't change the language other publications have used. Poojean (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be in favor of keeping the pronouns as she/her. Since it sounds like she is fine with both she/her and they/them, and she/her sounds more natural. I'm happy to hear other opinions though, especially if supported by reliable sources. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is actually no basis for changing the pronouns used to refer to subject. Article has used feminine pronouns since the beginning and subject herself has indicated "... no preference ..." according to cited sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnie Bob (talk • contribs)
FWIW, as Jessie's father and an older person, and given she has expressed no preference for one pronoun or the other, I concur with the above views to keep she/her. ArthurKaLi (talk) 07:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
