Talk:Jaya Prakash Narayana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lok Satta[edit]

Please look at the merge proposal of Lok Satta with Lok Satta (party). The latter would be the only existing article if the merge proposal is successful. You could discuss on Talk:Lok Satta (party). Thank you. -AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 04:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do not merge[edit]

Loksatta and Loksatta party are not same. Do not merge. Loksatta party is in politics but Loksatta organization is not. Their recognisations are different, press releases are different. In future if loksatta forms government then action taken by LS Movement and its functions will be quite different from Loksatta party.

Loksatta is a voluntary organization. It is working organization.

Loksatta is one news paper in Indian state of Maharastra. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.54.134.178 (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self promotion[edit]

Seems most of the information in sections are added without any reference . This creates a view of Self promotion . Interested parties editing the page please use ur login and then also make sure you add references to all the sections if not each line . Please improve the article if you really think you are promoting a real leader . I would like to see this page improved . thanks

--(Rajkumarth)...talk) 1984!#$ 14:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure this article was written with self promotion in mind, but I'm working on cleaning it up. The grammar is pretty rough by itself. Peasreach77 (talk) 04:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Dispute[edit]

Adding the NPOV language tag, citations are lacking for many points as mentioned in the previous comment, Things to be done to improve the article: add criticisms section indicating what the other points of view are. Add Citations and references etc and source the content as per wiki policy. The article is also poorly written needs a complete rewrite. Manquer (talk) 06:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2008/2009 Elections[edit]

I'm changing the language from "contesting elections" to something more like contesting seats. Maybe it should be challenging seats though. I think you can only contest election results after the fact. Contesting does not equal challenging an incumbent. Does that sound right? I'm not really familiar with the elections themselves. Peasreach77 (talk) 04:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing[edit]

I think I did all I could re copy editing. The page isn't perfect, so I'll leave the tag. I think poor/broken references may be a bigger problem. unreferenced tag seems in appropriate though. Is there a better one? Peasreach77 (talk) 04:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Promotion: Request for deletion[edit]

This is a Self-Promotion article about a not-so-famous leader of an unknown party. Request for deletion of article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.252.232.150 (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nagabhairava Jaya Prakash Narayana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]