Talk:Jarvis (album)

Bonus track[edit]

I've changed the name of the bonus track in the track listing. The track is not mentioned at all in the sleeve notes but is called "Running the World" on Jarvis' MySpace page and the download single is called the same. --Moochocoogle 19:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The full title is used on the vinyl 7 inch. I've also seen it written "(Cunts Are Still) Running The World". 217.34.39.123 09:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's called "Cunts Are Still Running The World", but I'd imagine there are rules against the word 'cunts' on MySpace. 86.7.82.158 17:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still incomplete?[edit]

Is this article still a stub, the templates still there but what's missing?

Spam?[edit]

Is Pitchfork really considered a professional music review site? --202.47.51.185 12:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC) i dont think so, but they are a undeniable strong voice in "alternative rock" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.180.180.195 (talk) 17:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How would you define a professional music review? It's not a personal blog; Pitchfork pays their writers, and has a full-time staff etc... Either way, it's not spam. DiggyG (talk) 19:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is considered professional. The writers are reviewed by an editing team, just like Rolling Stone, etc. StevePrutz (talk) 23:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Webber?[edit]

Does Mark Webber really play on the album? He doesn't appear to be credited on my copy, or in the credits section of this entry. FloydPink99 (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]